Goff v. Wiley
[Print This Page]Due to the extreme public interest in the blog posts concerning the latest lawsuit involving RSU and Joe Wiley, I have decided to create one page wherein all of the information can be synthesized.
- Jan.6, 2008: My Original Post Regarding this Lawsuit
- Jan. 22, 2008: My Second Post Regarding the Amended Petition
- Mar. 7, 2008: My Third Post Updating the Account of the Lawsuit (This is the one with all the comments.)

The Case
Marilyn McClain Goff v. Sheree L. Hukill, individually, Dr. Joe A. Wiley, individually, and Rogers State University Board of Regents [The University of Oklahoma Regents]
Original Case: Rogers County CJ-2008-31 (removed to federal court by RSU’s application)
Federal Case: United States Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma 08-CV-71-TCK-FHM
The Players
Marilyn McClain Goff: The Plaintiff. Alleges she was wrongfully terminated from her position at RSU after 15 years of service. Goff is represented by Brendan McHugh.
Sheree Hukill: A Defendant. Goff’s immediate supervisor. Has since resigned her position at RSU.
Joe Wiley: A Defendant. President of RSU. Was announced as next president of Freed-Hardeman University just days before this lawsuit was filed.
Rogers State University Board of Regents: A Defendant. There is technically no entity with the name “Rogers State University Board of Regents;” however, Rogers State University (along with OU and Cameron University) is governed by the University of Oklahoma Board of Regents.
Hukill, Wiley, and RSU (OU) are represented by University of Oklahoma legal counsel, though Hukill and Wiley were both sued in their individual capacities. Shawnae Robey has done most of OU’s work in this matter.

Info
The court action was originally filed in Rogers County District Court. It was automatically assigned to Judge Dynda Post. Upon motion from Hukill, Wiley, and RSU’s attorneys, the case was removed to federal court and is now being heard in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma in Tulsa. In recent cases, RSU has fared much better in federal court than in the district court, so it was not surprising to many observers when RSU asked to move the case to federal court. The federal case is presided over by Judge Terence Kern.

Documents
The federal courts have very good access to court filings through the PACER system. However, there is a charge of $.08 per page for court records. If you have to look up many things, the costs can add up. As I am going to pull the documents, I am more than happy to provide them to you here at no charge.
Plaintiff’s (Goff’s) filings in blue. Defendants’ (Hukill’s, Wiley’s, and RSU’s) filings in green. Court orders, opinions, and decisions in red. Items stricken through have been stricken by the judge’s order. Click the [PDF] link for document on file with the federal court.
- 2/12/2008 - Filing 1: Civil Cover Sheet (filed by RSU) [PDF]
- 2/12/2008 - Filing 2-
- 2/12/2008 - Filing 3: Minute Order:
- Full docket text for document 3:
MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk, directing The University of Oklahoma Board of Regents to file a Corporate Disclosure Statement pursuant to FRCvP 7.1 within five (5) days of this order, if they have not already done so. The parties shall use the form entitled Corporate Disclosure Statement available on the Courts website (please do not refile if already filed on non-court form unless directed to do so). If you have already filed your Corporate Disclosure Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Corporate Disclosure Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires. (lml, Dpty Clk)
- Full docket text for document 3:
- 2/12/2008 - Filing 4: Minute Order:
- Full docket text for document 4:
MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk, : Pursuant to Local Rule 81.2, the removing party(ies) shall file a Status Report on Removed Action within five (5) days of the filing of the notice of removal in the U.S. District Court. The form is available on the Court’s website. (lml, Dpty Clk)
- Full docket text for document 4:
- 2/12/2008 - Filing 5: Status Report on Removed Action [PDF]
- 2/12/2008 - Filing 6: Entry of Appearance (Robey for Hukill, Wiley, and RSU in federal court) [PDF]
- 2/14/2008 - Filing 7: Corporate Disclosure Statement [PDF]
- 2/15/2008 - Filing 8: Notice of Filing Notice of Removal [PDF]
- 2/15/2008 - Filing 9: Certificate of filing notice of removal with the district court [PDF]
- 2/19/2008 - Filing 10: Entry of Appearance (McHugh for Goff in federal court) [PDF]
- 2/19/2008 - Filing 11: Plaintiff’s Demand for Jury Trial [PDF]
- 2/19/2008 - Filing 12: Notice that Plaintiff agrees to removal to federal court [PDF]
- 2/21/2008 - Filing 13: Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [PDF]
- 3/10/2008 - Filing 14-1: Plaintiff’s Response and Objection to Motion to Dismiss [PDF]
- 3/14/2008 - Filing 15: Summons to RSU, Wiley, and Hukill [PDF]
- 3/24/2008 - Filing 16: Defendants’ Motion to Strike Exhibits attached to Filing 14 [PDF]
- 3/24/2008 - Filing 17: Defendants’ Reply to Plaintiff’s Response and Objection to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [PDF]
- 3/31/2008 - Filing 18: Plaintiff’s Motion to Defendants’ Motion to Strike [PDF]
- 4/3/2008 - Filing 19: Defendants’ Reply to Plaintiff’s Response to Defendants’ Motion to Strike [PDF]
- 4/23/2008 - Filing 20: Order for Parties to File a Joint Status Report [PDF]
- 4/24/2008 - Filing 21: Order Granting Defendants’ Motion to Strike Exhibits 1 & 2 to Filing 14 [PDF]
- 5/22/2008 - Filing 22: Motion to Accelerate/Extend/Reset Hearing(s)/Deadline(s) [PDF]
- 5/22/2008 - Filing 23: Order (Granting Motion (Filing 22)) [PDF]
- 6/23/2008 - Filing 24: Motion to Stay [PDF]
- 7/14/2008 - Filing 25: Response in Opposition to Motion [PDF]
- 7/15/2008 - Filing 26: Motion to Strike [PDF]
- 7/16/2008 - Filing 27: Minute Order
- Full docket text for document 27:
MINUTE ORDER by Judge Terence Kern, setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): (Plaintiff is directed to file a response to Doc. 26 no later than Monday, 7/21/2008.) ( Responses due by 7/21/2008) (Re: [26] MOTION to Strike Plaintiffs Response and Objection to Defendants Motion to Stay Proceedings ) (JLW, Chambers)
- Full docket text for document 27:
- 7/21/2008 - Filing 28: Response in Opposition to Motion [PDF]
- 7/22/2008 - Filing 29: Minute Order
- Full docket text for document 29:
MINUTE ORDER by Judge Terence Kern ; denying [26] Motion to Strike (JLW, Chambers)
- Full docket text for document 29:
- 7/25/2008 - Filing 30: Reply to Response to Motion [PDF]






