Comments on: The Benefit of a Doubt http://tysonwynn.com/2008/01/28/the-benefit-of-a-doubt/ Right-Wing Nutjob, Religious Fanatic & Citizen Journalist Tyson Wynn Thu, 01 Mar 2012 17:35:26 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: A Olson http://tysonwynn.com/2008/01/28/the-benefit-of-a-doubt/comment-page-1/#comment-5517 A Olson Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:41:06 +0000 http://tysonwynn.com/index.php/2008/01/28/the-benefit-of-a-doubt/#comment-5517 Yes I would like to know more about what happened with the little lady from Bit by Bit and what is happening down there now. There is alot of stink on many and what info do they have on the upper crust so they can keep their jobs. Yes I would like to know more about what happened
with the little lady from Bit by Bit and what is
happening down there now. There is alot of stink
on many and what info do they have on the upper
crust so they can keep their jobs.

]]> By: doubting Rice http://tysonwynn.com/2008/01/28/the-benefit-of-a-doubt/comment-page-1/#comment-5505 doubting Rice Wed, 17 Jun 2009 20:29:45 +0000 http://tysonwynn.com/index.php/2008/01/28/the-benefit-of-a-doubt/#comment-5505 As a casualty of the TRiO Programs I can tell you that what I have been reading about Rice is absolutely true. He brought in a woman named Sara Schoenefeld to be interim director of everything following the dismissal of those deposed by the feds. This woman rode in like a warrior and began to slash swords in a group of hurting, stunned people. Do you remember Mrs. Drysdale in the old Beverly Hillbillies show? THAT is Sara Schoenefeld. A more arrogant, ignorant woman never lived. She took her orders from Wiley and Andrews and advised staff that it would be "unethical" for her to be aware of the reports from the feds of wrong doing! UNETHICAL! HA! If only I could be at liverty to share the LIST of edicts she declared that were STUNNINGLY outside the bounds of our grants! Didn't matter! She was working at the "behest" of the President...we asked...which President? Is it Wiley (still hanging around for months?) or is it Rice? Who knew!? It was and still is a MESS! Arrogance reigned supreme. They did not know federal grants for higher ed (she claimed she knew all she needed to know because she had worked in K-12) Well, Rice had and should know the difference between adults and kids. It's heartbreaking. I'd like to know more about Jan Fellman. I'd like to know more about what happened with the little lady from Bit-By-Bit...what has happened there. That was OUTRAGEOUS and Rice has stink on his hands over that one as far as I'm concerned. Rice was a HUGE disappointment. Toby? HMMMM... what's the point of Toby? He didn't know squat! As a casualty of the TRiO Programs I can tell you that what I have been reading about Rice is absolutely true. He brought in a woman named Sara Schoenefeld to be interim director of everything following the dismissal of those deposed by the feds. This woman rode in like a warrior and began to slash swords in a group of hurting, stunned people. Do you remember Mrs. Drysdale in the old Beverly Hillbillies show? THAT is Sara Schoenefeld. A more arrogant, ignorant woman never lived. She took her orders from Wiley and Andrews and advised staff that it would be “unethical” for her to be aware of the reports from the feds of wrong doing! UNETHICAL! HA! If only I could be at liverty to share the LIST of edicts she declared that were STUNNINGLY outside the bounds of our grants! Didn’t matter! She was working at the “behest” of the President…we asked…which President? Is it Wiley (still hanging around for months?) or is it Rice? Who knew!? It was and still is a MESS! Arrogance reigned supreme. They did not know federal grants for higher ed (she claimed she knew all she needed to know because she had worked in K-12) Well, Rice had and should know the difference between adults and kids. It’s heartbreaking. I’d like to know more about Jan Fellman. I’d like to know more about what happened with the little lady from Bit-By-Bit…what has happened there. That was OUTRAGEOUS and Rice has stink on his hands over that one as far as I’m concerned. Rice was a HUGE disappointment. Toby? HMMMM… what’s the point of Toby? He didn’t know squat!

]]> By: Tyson http://tysonwynn.com/2008/01/28/the-benefit-of-a-doubt/comment-page-1/#comment-3922 Tyson Tue, 29 Jan 2008 22:27:46 +0000 http://tysonwynn.com/index.php/2008/01/28/the-benefit-of-a-doubt/#comment-3922 Actually, I am more of a right-wing zealot than I appear. Liberals just like it when I am zealous for a cause they also cherish. :) Actually, I am more of a right-wing zealot than I appear. Liberals just like it when I am zealous for a cause they also cherish.

:)

]]> By: RSU Prof http://tysonwynn.com/2008/01/28/the-benefit-of-a-doubt/comment-page-1/#comment-3886 RSU Prof Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:52:22 +0000 http://tysonwynn.com/index.php/2008/01/28/the-benefit-of-a-doubt/#comment-3886 Tyson, I agree that "la affaire Fellman" was a civil liberties disaster, and that Peter Williams (among others) appeared to have been targeted unfairly by the previous administration. It certainly was not my intention to "give a pass" to the previous administration, but simply to recognize that the administration seemed to have a bit of a manichean quality to it: a lot of good, a lot of evil, not a whole lot of in-between. Part of the reason I was never in his sights is precisely that I was a faculty member -- my primary complaint about the previous administratio was the way they treated staff, and I intend to make the president-designate aware of some of the problems with the current staffing environment. Finally, I realize that you are less the right-wing zealot than you portray yourself. I suspect that we both have lots of friends "on the other side of the aisle," as it should be. Cheers. Tyson,

I agree that “la affaire Fellman” was a civil liberties disaster, and that Peter Williams (among others) appeared to have been targeted unfairly by the previous administration. It certainly was not my intention to “give a pass” to the previous administration, but simply to recognize that the administration seemed to have a bit of a manichean quality to it: a lot of good, a lot of evil, not a whole lot of in-between. Part of the reason I was never in his sights is precisely that I was a faculty member — my primary complaint about the previous administratio was the way they treated staff, and I intend to make the president-designate aware of some of the problems with the current staffing environment.

Finally, I realize that you are less the right-wing zealot than you portray yourself. I suspect that we both have lots of friends “on the other side of the aisle,” as it should be.

Cheers.

]]>